Elasticsearch is the way

Don't get me wrong, i love Apache Solr, i think it's a wonderful project and the versions 4.x are definitely something you should check out when building a proper search engine.

But Elasticsearch, at least for me, is now the way to the future. If you need a few reasons why, read on :

Out of the box scalability

SolrCloud is doing a good job trying to get Solr into the Cloud era, because even if Solr supported distributed query before, sharding had to be done manually...

Elasticsearch scalability is so easy it's a bit frightening, every time i set up a new elasticsearch “single” server i deactivate as soon as possible the cluster-search capability, just in case it starts replicating the internet on my machine !  Sharding/Replication is automatic and almost a necessity, because your server (by default) will remind you that you're a dangerous person keeping all your data on a single machine, and will stay in a yellow state until you start adding some nodes !

Comprehensive Json-based HTTP search API

In all honesty sometimes the json-based search queries can become quite complicated and tedious to read, but it's much more powerful than a simple ?q=....  query or the long and complicated list of URL-GET parameters you end up using with Solr... So even if there are no proper Chrome extension to create a GET HTTP request with a JSON body (!! add a comment if you find one !!), i still think it's a blessing to have that kind of query capacity, and it made me rethink about elasticsearch's tolerance/suitability for complex query (c.f.  the “As complex as Solr” part).

Rivers...

Probably one of the best feature of Elasticsearch, it's designed around the fantastic (and true) idea that an Elasticsearch index needs to be fed !

Just this concept changes everything, because it makes the “realtime index” the default type of index, because anyway nowadays what matters most is to have an up-to-date search index and it's a fact that Near-Realtime search is one the many advantages that makes Solr and Elasticsearch the best choices out there.

Vibrant community and plugins

Probably the most important part, in my opinion, i do think that the Solr ecosystem lacks a lot of good tools and plugins to leverage more of its power. Luke is a pretty useful tool, but it's very lucene-centric, apart from the solr-provided tools (which are, i must say, sufficient for a lot troubleshooting and debugging). I've been on Solr 3.x for a long time, and even if all the tools where there, the UI certainly lacked in terms of “sexy”, nowadays Solr 4.x's UI is certainly more sexy and a pleasure to work with, but it's still only the work of Lucidworks.

Elasticsearch is brand new, the documentation is sexy, the project is sexy, they built a wonderful plugin system that uses github directly !! You don't have to be a fully accredited “Elasticsearch-compliant plugin creator” to publish your project.

So a lot of people created wonderful plugins, that already goes beyond what you can use in the Solr/Lucene world, just a quick review :

• Paramedic : a “simple and sexy tool to monitor and inspect elasticsearch clusters”;
• Head : “A web front end for an ElasticSearch cluster” with a real-time dashboard;
• BigDesk : Live charts and statistics for Elasticsearch cluster;

• For the analysis, you have Inquisitor

  <p>
    to help understand and debug your queries in ElasticSearch and <a title="SegmentSpy" href="https://github.com/polyfractal/elasticsearch-segmentspy">SegmentSpy</a> to watch real time segments merging and changing.</li> </ul> 
    
    <p style="text-align:justify;">
      This is just the state of the art right now, but i can't imagine it going anywhere but forward.
    </p>
    
    <h2 style="text-align:justify;">
      As complex as Solr
    </h2>
    
    <p style="text-align:justify;">
      Finally, i had prejudiced, because i thought that the goals of Elasticsearch in terms of scalability where clearly ambitious (and deeply needed !), but that <span style="text-decoration:underline;">this kind of scalability obviously came at a cost and therefor there would be less features than what Solr offered</span> (ex. <a title="Dismax" href="http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DisMax">Dismax</a> queries).
    </p>
    
    <p style="text-align:justify;">
      But <span style="text-decoration:underline;"><strong>i was</strong><strong> wrong</strong></span>, as i discovered recently that Dismax queries, fuzzy matching and other goodies allowing many things from <em>boosted-field at query time</em> to <em>boosted sub-queries</em>, are available and easily accessible thanks to the Elasticsearch API. So the proper section-name should not be &#8220;As complex as Solr&#8221; but <strong>&#8220;As versatile as Solr&#8221;.</strong>
    </p>
    
    <p style="text-align:justify;">
      I hope i made my point, and if you're considering building a BigData-ready search engine right now, make sure to check out <a href="http://elasticsearch.org">Elasticsearch</a> or you'll be missing out on a great product.
    </p>
    
    <p style="text-align:justify;">
      <em>Vale</em>
    </p>